Showing posts with label global rents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global rents. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

Southampton, Blackpool and Hull are top buy-to-let hotspots


Southampton, Blackpool and Hull have been named as the country's top "buy-to-let hotspots" for landlords looking to make good returns on their investments.
Due to its relatively affordable houses and average rents of £901 per month, Southampton topped the list compiled by HSBC of the best places for investors to put their cash.
Average property prices in Southampton are around £138,000, meaning that the average rental yield that an investor can expect to make is around 7.82%.
Blackpool came in second place, with its glittering Golden Mile, seaside views and popularity with tourists looking for holiday rentals and seasonal workers. Average rents in Blackpool stand at £494 a month, delivering a rental yield to investors of around 7.81%.
The rental yield on a property is the annual return that an investor can expect to make on it. It is worked out by calculating a year's rental income as a percentage of how much the rental property cost in the first place.
With their relatively cheap property prices, northern towns and cities dominated the top of the list. Hull, with its large student population, came in third position and Manchester was in fourth place.
There has recently been renewed interest in the buy-to-let sector, which has provided some decent returns at a time when savers are struggling to make any real money on their cash pots amid low interest rates.
Rents have soared in some regions over the last year amid strong demand in the rental sector and there have also been signs of lenders expanding their buy-to-let deals to meet the increased interest from investors.
Peter Dockar, head of mortgages at HSBC, said: "Buy-to-let remains a good investment for those looking for above-average returns. Twenty-three of the top 50 areas offer yields above 5%, significantly more than is available from more traditional savings options.
"However, it is clear there is a fine line between a property in a desirable area, the rents that can be achieved and the returns that can be yielded so it is key landlords do their research as often the most popular locations may not offer the best return."
HSBC looked at the 50 towns across England and Wales with the highest concentrations of private rental housing stock. Cardiff came just outside the top 10 best rental returns list at number 11, with average rental yields of 6.39%.
Despite the high rents charged in London, the capital did not score particularly highly in terms of the returns that investors can make because property prices are also high. Southwark produced the best returns out of the areas studied, at 6.15%.
The London boroughs of Hammersmith and Fulham and Kensington and Chelsea were found to generate the lowest yields out of the 50 areas looked at due to their expensive house prices. These London boroughs were found to generate average returns of 3.42% and 3.34% respectively.
While the typical monthly rent in Kensington and Chelsea was found to be £3,033, the average house price would set an aspiring landlord back by £1.09 million.

Sunday, 7 July 2013

Prime rents in key cities around the world


Prime rents in key cities worldwide rose by 0.2% in the first quarter of 2013, the index’s lowest rate of quarterly growth since late 2009.

Key points 
* The Knight Frank Prime Global Rental Index rose by 0.2% in the first quarter of 2013 and by 3.8% in the year to March
* The index has risen for 15 consecutive quarters and now stands 20.3% above its low in the second quarter of 2009
* Dubai saw the largest increase in prime rents, up 18% year-on-year
* The leading financial centres of Hong Kong, New York and London were some of the weakest
performers, recording falls of 2.3%, 2.6% and 3.1% respectively
* On a regional basis, the Middle East saw the strongest rise in prime rents (up 13.1%) and North
America the weakest (down 0.7%)

Prime rents are rising strongly in many emerging markets, but this growth is being overshadowed by weakening rents in some of the world’s more established financial centres such as Hong Kong, New York and London.
Luxury rents in Dubai, Nairobi and Beijing rose by 18.3%, 13.9% and 12.3% respectively in the
year to March. 
By comparison, Hong Kong, New York and London saw prime rents fall by 2.3%, 2.6% and 3.1% over the same period. In this second group of cities, the rental markets have suffered as relocation budgets for executives have been trimmed during a period of weaker financial sector performance.
Despite the slower rate of growth this quarter, the index, which tracks the performance of
luxury lettings markets worldwide and which is increasingly influenced by corporate and
expatriate demand, has now risen for 15 consecutive quarters and stands 20.3% above its low in Q2 2009.
Global mobility is on the rise as companies look to plug their skills gap but the latest figures suggest it is increasingly a west to east shift with many multinationals relocating a growing  a portion of their key talent to growth markets in Africa, China and the Middle East.
A regional breakdown of rental performance confirms this trend. The Middle East, Africa and Asia saw average growth of 13.1%, 7.0% and 3.1% respectively in the year to March.
Prime rents in Europe and North America fared less well, recording average growth of 0.9% and -0.7%. Here, salaries are failing to keep pace with inflation and the economic recovery remains in a fragile state.
With the US jobs market picking up and tentative signs of improving business sentiment in the Eurozone we may see rents strengthen in New York and potentially London in the second half of 2013. However, we expect the emerging markets to continue to top the rankings as established industries in Europe and the US look to tap into new world markets.

Knight Frank Prime Global Rental Index, percentage changes over 12-month, 6-month, 3-month period

1 Dubai Middle East 18.3% 10.1% 3.5%
2 Nairobi Africa 13.9% 7.5% 2.2%
3 Beijing Asia Pacific 12.3% 4.4% 1.8%
4 Tel Aviv Middle East 7.9% 5.4% 3.6%
5 Zurich Europe 6.3% 3.1% -1.5%
6 Guangzhou Asia Pacific 3.1% 1.0% 0.5%
7 Shanghai Asia Pacific 3.0% 0.7% 0.5%
8 Geneva Europe 2.8% 2.8% 2.8%
9 Singapore Asia Pacific 1.9% 1.5% 0.8%
10 Toronto North America 1.2% 0.8% 1.2%
11 Tokyo Asia Pacific 0.7% 1.6% -0.2%
12 Cape Town Africa 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
13 Hong Kong* Asia Pacific -2.3% -0.7% -5.1%
14 Moscow Europe -2.6% -1.1% 0.1%
15 New York North America -2.6% -6.5% -6.6%
16 London Europe -3.1% -1.6% -0.3%